With mutual funds, whether two managers are better than one depends on the fund.
It's no surprise that many mutual funds run by a lone portfolio manager produce enviable returns. Legg Mason's Bill Miller has for years outmaneuvered a range of markets to turn in strong results. But funds that in some cases employ small armies of managers also can demonstrate impressive success. Some use a team approach, relying on several people to run the same fund, and others divvy up parts of a fund or fund family and give each manager an area of responsibility. American Funds, for example, uses multiple managers and has shown strong results.
Although none of the approaches appears to be a clear winner, the notion of tapping the expertise of more than one person to steer a fund has its backers.
"You get a benefit from having more than one person looking at the market on a regular basis," said Wyatt Crumpler, vice president of trust investments at American Beacon Mutual Funds.
Beacon uses outside managers to oversee the funds and monitors their performance in what often is referred to as a manager of managers approach.
It's not new, but Crumpler contends it works by harnessing a range of expertise. The American Beacon Large Cap Value Fund, for example, is 20 years old and is run by a stable of managers. With about $7.82 billion in assets, its year-to-date return is about 4.5 percent. Its three-year annualized return is nearly 15.67 percent, and its five-year annualized return is 15.52 percent.
Crumpler said keeping fund managers at arm's length makes it easier to monitor a fund's performance using strictly objective measures.
"All we have to do is if we have a manager that's underperforming is terminate the relationship and bring in somebody new or switch the funds to one of the existing managers," Crumpler said. It's not something the fund finds necessary to do often.
Paul Alan Davis, a portfolio manager at Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc., oversees three funds that are part of a group of nine funds.
"The combination is good because we can see what's happening from different schools of thought," he said of the experience brought by his fellow managers and the manager overseeing the nine funds.
Using more than one person might help managers hew to a fund family's philosophy and not bend to an individual's preferences, but Crumpler said some investors are critical of such an approach out of concern the funds will be too rigid and resemble little more than index funds. And that's without the generally lower fees of index versus managed funds.
However, he dismisses the concern, arguing that the funds are nimble enough to make deft moves and that the philosophy itself is beneficial.
"It's not really a philosophy that will lead us to mimicking an index," he said.
